Neem is the end-to-end solution for clinical trial sites. Neem's technology streamlines the hardest parts of trial operations. Beyond that, Neem goes above and beyond by collaborating with sites to build customized, last mile tools, ensuring that existing workflows and preferences are respected, and that our technology adapts to your site, not the other way around.
Clinical trial operations have become an exercise in managing complexity. Coordinators juggle eSource systems, eCOA platforms, EDC interfaces, eConsent workflows, and SAE reporting tools (often from different vendors) that rarely talk to each other. Sponsors struggle to get clean, timely data from the sites running their studies. CROs spend as much time wrangling systems as they do managing trials. Every monitoring visit means reconciling source documents across systems. Every protocol deviation generates queries across multiple platforms. Every new study means onboarding yet another point solution with its own login, its own training, and its own way of doing things.
The software meant to solve this often made things worse. Most of it was built on the assumption that every site works the same way; that your PIs have the same preferences, your team follows the same workflow, and the right answer is a standardized system with enough training and support. That assumption is wrong. No amount of customer success fixes a tool that was never designed for how your site actually operates.
Every site is different. Every PI has preferences. Every team has a rhythm. We don’t ask you to change any of that.
We spend time at your site understanding your existing workflows, your systems, your team’s preferences, and how your PIs actually like things done.
We build the last mile: connecting your existing tools to Neem in the background. No new logins. No software replacements. No standardized workflow imposed on your team.
Coordinators work in the environments they already know. Assistance is layered on top, surfacing what matters, reducing what’s manual, keeping the human in the loop.
Coordinators currently track ConMed–AE relationships manually, across disconnected systems. Neem automatically surfaces potential relationships, flags them for review, and prepares documentation — with the coordinator confirming every step.

Missed ConMed–AE relationships are among the most common sources of protocol deviations and safety reporting failures. This is one of the highest-stakes workflows in trial operations, and one of the most manual. Neem changes that without removing the human from the loop.
We’re building for the coordinators who stay late reconciling data, the site managers balancing twenty active protocols, and the CROs trying to keep multi-site studies on track. We understand the complexity of this work because we’ve studied it deeply: the regulatory landscape, the vendor fragmentation, and the day-to-day operational friction. Our commitment is straightforward: build tools that respect the complexity of clinical work, reduce the burden on the people doing it, and ultimately help bring treatments to patients faster.